Score: 10

"The best."

submission: C.A.T

date: December 15, 2007

I loved it, well, besides the explosion on the end.

Score: 7

"Nope nope..."

submission: C.A.T 2

date: December 15, 2007

C.A.T 1 was better, the fact that it was so badly drawn made it funny. This is just a meh. Get back to making bad drawings, you were alot better at that (and I mean that in the most positive way). :)

Score: 9

"COCK"

submission: The NG Redesign Collab

date: July 17, 2007

While the content is indeed epic, the scene selection is not. If you're going to look for a scene selection now, it's not there.

Score: 2

"That's strange..."

submission: Draw-A-Game

date: May 7, 2007

When I read you were asked to make something unique I was excited, unique games don't get made that often anymore.

But this isn't unique at all, it's almost the same as I did back in January 2006 with Jack Russell. It doesn't really add any fun, it's just a lame ripoff with an even lamer goal. Yay get higher, yay.

Pros:
+ It works

Cons:
- Not unique
- No real goal
- Booooring

Score: 2

"Meh..."

submission: WoW Connect

date: September 29, 2006

If you made a nice background, kept the original Mahjong graphics this game would be awesome. But you tried to give this a publicity and popularity boost by sprinkling some WoW graphics over it. Bad decision because this really gets the game down.

Pros:
+ Mahjong = fun.
+ Awesome gameplay.

Cons:
- Non-fitting WoW theme.

Score: 10

"YA!"

submission: Aqua Slug

date: August 23, 2006

It rules, but when I had to poo with Toast I died lolololol.

Score: 1

"Am I the only one who thinks this game sucks?"

submission: Super Smash Flash

date: August 22, 2006

First of all, the graphics are all stolen none of them are yours. I'm talking about characters graphics and overall design of the menu and logo's. They're all copyrighted, by getting this game sponsored your risk that Nintendo is gonna sue you.

Well, second the camera was really stupid, it was zoomed out all the time while in the real SSBM it zooms in at points. The controls were real glitchy. The framerate was awful at times.

Get your own ideas, don't try to remake a great game like SSBM.

Score: 6

"Meh..."

submission: Ultimate Jewel

date: May 26, 2006

It's like a 1-on-1 copy of Bejeweled. If this was an original puzzle game it would have rocked but this just makes it a bad copy. Also I didn't like that you didn't put highscores in, it's so easy these days and adds so much replay value!

The graphics weren't really great but weren't bad either so I'd say mediocore. The sounds were good enough. Ofcourse no violence and humor (But it's a puzzle game so those 2 factors don't matter).

Pros:
+ Bejeweled...yes...

Cons:
- 1-on-1 copy, just play the original. It's better!
- Graphics.

Score: 10

"Great stuff!"

submission: The Flying PiggyBank

date: May 26, 2006

Now that's what I call an original game! I first thought this was going to be some kind of bad space shooter but oh was I wrong. This really was challenging! I really liked the music and sounds!

The only minus point I really found is that there should be something to return for. Something like another mode, or maybe something really stupid like hats to collect!

( Thanks for using ArmorBot! =D )

Pros:
+ Nice Audio!
+ Original gameplay!
+ Great difficulty!

Cons:
- Not a great replay value.

Score: 4

"No, just no..."

submission: Dangerous Dave

date: May 26, 2006

First of all Dangerous Dave ofcourse already is a videogame character. Second this genre of games has been done...and done...and done! And obviously hitting something with a bat was the first thing ever done in that Yeti games. The graphics were nice but no fun at all...

Pros:
+ Great graphics!
+ Funny!

Cons:
- Won't last long.
- Unoriginal.